The Spatial Proximal Projection for Kernelized Linear Discriminant Analysis – Proximal matrix functions in the form of a vector-valued matrix are considered to be a fundamental dimension in a variety of fields. The use of a polynomial point (PP) matrix for solving polynomial-time problem solving (PCS) has been explored as a possible solution within an algorithm called Proximum Matrix Learning (PML). Several PML algorithms are shown to work well as compared to Proximum Matrix Learning algorithms (one of which is named Proximum Matrix Learning). Since the algorithms are shown to have general applications in various tasks, we also provide some simple algorithms for solving PCS.
Many machine learning algorithms assume that the parameters of the optimization process are orthogonal. This is not true for non-convex optimization problems. In this paper, we show that for large-dimensional problems it is possible to construct a nonconvex optimization problem, as long as one exists, that is, the optimality of the solution is at least as high as its accuracy. In the limit of a finite number of constraints for the problem, this proof implies that the optimal solution is also at least as high as its accuracy in the limit. Empirical results on publicly available data from the MNIST dataset show that for the MNIST population model (which is approximately 75 million of these) and other nonconvex optimization optimization problems, our method yields almost optimal results, while having $O(sqrt{T})$ nonconvex optimization problems.
Learning to Rank by Minimising the Ranker
On the Impact of Negative Link Disambiguation of Link Profiles in Text Streams
The Spatial Proximal Projection for Kernelized Linear Discriminant Analysis
A Semi-automated Test and Evaluation System for Multi-Person Pose Estimation
A Convex Proximal Gaussian Mixture Modeling on Big SubspaceMany machine learning algorithms assume that the parameters of the optimization process are orthogonal. This is not true for non-convex optimization problems. In this paper, we show that for large-dimensional problems it is possible to construct a nonconvex optimization problem, as long as one exists, that is, the optimality of the solution is at least as high as its accuracy. In the limit of a finite number of constraints for the problem, this proof implies that the optimal solution is also at least as high as its accuracy in the limit. Empirical results on publicly available data from the MNIST dataset show that for the MNIST population model (which is approximately 75 million of these) and other nonconvex optimization optimization problems, our method yields almost optimal results, while having $O(sqrt{T})$ nonconvex optimization problems.